Is Wiki Authority Group legitimate?
Yes, and you should not take our word for it. Wiki Authority Group is the trading name of Wiki Authority LLC, a Missouri limited liability company, file number LC014770442. We draft Wikipedia articles and edit requests as a disclosed paid editor. We are not Wikipedia. Below is what we do, what we refuse to promise, how to check us, and when you should not hire us at all.
What we actually do
We start with an audit of you or your company, in full detail. We search for every lead and every piece of independent coverage we can find, then show you the result, because you may know of material we could not find or reach: an old newspaper clipping, an archived review, a trade journal. When needed we run archive searches for exactly that.
When the audit is done, you and we both know whether the subject meets Wikipedia’s own criteria for an article. If the answer is no, we tell you. If the case is workable, we write the draft to the guidelines, and if someone tried before and failed, we first find out why, fix it, and only then submit. Every draft goes through Articles for Creation, so a volunteer reviewer accepts it before it becomes an article. We charge for the work, not for the outcome.
What we are not
We are not Wikipedia and we never claim to be. We are an experienced team that knows Wikipedia’s guidelines and policies and abides by every rule Wikipedia sets. People get the wrong idea about firms like ours from ugly past experiences, their own failed attempts, or bad actors who promised them a page. Our answer to that is to be transparent, which is what this page is for.
How to check us before you pay
Search the file number LC014770442 on the Missouri Secretary of State’s business entity search. Ask us for a copy of the state registration document and we will send it. Ask which Wikipedia accounts will do your work; we tell you, so you can read their disclosures and their edit history yourself. Ask to speak with an existing client, and we will connect you with one who has agreed to take calls. Beyond that, we let the work speak for itself.
Who does the work
The company is run by editors. We do not name them on this site, and client work is never posted from anyone’s personal account. The accounts that do paid work carry the disclosures Wikipedia requires. We are a fairly new company, and we want to do honest work and be judged by it. Junior consultants handle research and double-check everything we present to you and to Wikipedia. Most of our work comes through referrals.
What we refuse to promise
We refuse to guarantee a published page. That is not because we do not know how to get one live. It is because Wikipedia’s volunteer editors make their own decisions, and they can accept or decline an entry on many grounds. We know the guidelines and what reviewers want to see, and we follow them so a reviewer has no reason to decline. The work is done to Wikipedia’s rules. The decision belongs to a human being who may be having any kind of day. When a reviewer declines, they leave a reason; we work on that reason, fix it and resubmit. If the case turns out not to be realistic, the refund rule applies.
When the case is weak
We search deeper. Archives, old newspaper clippings, anything of use. If that turns up nothing, we tell you to earn coverage before pursuing Wikipedia. Earning means an independent writer deciding to write about you, not a paid promotion, and not a press release. We would rather lose the engagement than file a draft that will be declined.
Will people know I paid?
Yes. Not on the article itself, but it is always disclosed, on the editing account’s user page and on the article’s talk page, because that is what Wikipedia requires of paid editors. We tell every client this before they pay. If a firm tells you nobody will know, it is breaking Wikipedia’s Terms of Use, and the article is at risk from the day it goes live.
If something goes wrong
You hear from us. If a draft is declined or an article is tagged, we read the reason, fix every error we can, and resubmit as many times as it takes, as long as each resubmission carries a real improvement. If the reason is one we cannot fix, we tell you in writing and stop.
What the scam warnings get right
Many of our clients were burnt before they found us, and the more we studied how those firms work, the clearer the pattern became. They do not disclose. They do not write to the guidelines. They do no real research. They publish from anonymous IP addresses instead of disclosed editor accounts. And they promise and “guarantee” a page they do not and cannot control. Wikipedia’s own scam warning says the same. A guarantee is the first warning sign.
Should you just write it yourself?
You can. Wikipedia allows it, with care. Read the conflict of interest guideline and disclose that you are the subject. Handle every claim, every link and every source yourself. Submit through Articles for Creation, cross-check your own work, avoid AI-generated text, avoid bias, and avoid any word that praises the subject. Read the guidelines and learn them. If you have the time to do all of that, you do not need us. If you do not, that is the work we do.
Questions people ask
Is Wiki Authority Group a legitimate company?
Yes. Wiki Authority Group is the trading name of Wiki Authority LLC, a Missouri limited liability company, file number LC014770442, organized in August 2026. The record is on the Missouri Secretary of State’s business entity search. It is a new company run by Wikipedia editors, and it works mostly through referrals.
Is Wiki Authority Group part of Wikipedia?
No. Wiki Authority Group is not Wikipedia, is not affiliated with the Wikimedia Foundation, and has no special standing on Wikipedia. It is an independent team that knows Wikipedia’s guidelines and policies and works inside them, as a disclosed paid editor.
Does Wiki Authority Group guarantee a Wikipedia page?
No. Volunteer editors review every draft and make their own decision, so nobody can guarantee a page. Wiki Authority Group guarantees its own work: an audit against Wikipedia’s criteria before any drafting, a draft that follows the guidelines, submission through Articles for Creation, and fixes and resubmissions when a reviewer gives a reason. A guarantee of publication is the first sign of a scam.
What happens if my case is too weak for Wikipedia?
The audit says so, in writing, before any drafting starts. Wiki Authority Group then searches deeper, including newspaper archives, for coverage that may exist but is hard to find. If there is still not enough independent coverage, it tells you to earn coverage first, meaning independent writers covering you, not paid promotion, and the engagement stops there.
Will people know I paid for my Wikipedia article?
Yes. Wikipedia requires paid editing to be disclosed, so your name appears as the client on the editing account’s user page and on the article’s talk page. It is not shown on the article itself. Wiki Authority Group tells every client this before they pay.
How can I verify Wiki Authority Group before paying?
Search the file number on the Missouri Secretary of State’s business entity search. Ask for a copy of the state registration document. Ask which Wikipedia accounts will do the work and read their disclosures and edit history. Ask to speak with an existing client who has agreed to take calls.
What does Wiki Authority Group do if a draft is declined?
The reviewer leaves a reason. The team tells the client, fixes what the reviewer flagged, and resubmits, as many times as a real improvement is possible. If the reason cannot be fixed, it says so in writing and the refund rule applies.
Guides
Policies cited
Ask whether a page is possible
Send a name and anything written about the subject by someone else. You get a written source review before any payment.
Book a review call